Airframe Construction Materials Kit

Foam vs Composite Airframe Recognition & Characterization

This kit equips bomb technicians with a direct material-comparison training set featuring 2 non-flying drone surrogates of the same large-format flying wing airframe built in two different construction materials — expanded polyolefin (EPO) foam and glass-fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite. Construction material directly impacts render-safe approach decisions, tool selection, and hazard assessment. Understanding what you are looking at before you touch it is foundational. All platforms are static training aids, not configured for flight.

Kit Contents (2 Platforms, 2 Construction Classes)

• Large-Format Flying Wing – Foam (x1) — 2,122mm wingspan, EPO foam construction, 1-2 kg payload capacity. Lightweight, field-repairable, lower cost per unit. Threat category: Medium-range ISR / Payload delivery.
• Large-Format Flying Wing – Composite (x1) — 2,122mm wingspan, GFRP composite construction, same airframe geometry. Higher structural rigidity, weather resistance, and radar cross-section characteristics. Threat category: Advanced ISR / Composite threat.

Platform Gallery

Large-Format Flying Wing — Foam
x1 unit

Large-Format Flying Wing — Composite
x1 unit

Training Focus

• Visual and tactile material identification (foam vs composite)
• Construction method indicators and manufacturing sophistication assessment
• Implications for render-safe tool selection (cutting, breaching, disassembly)
• Weight, rigidity, and damage-tolerance comparison
• Radar cross-section and detection implications of composite construction

Included

• 2 fixed-wing UAS airframes — same geometry, different construction materials
• Receiving, inspection, labeling and consolidated packaging
• Import compliance, customs clearance and CONUS freight
• Digital training reference package with platform specs, material analysis, and threat context

Lead Time: 6-8 weeks from purchase order to CONUS delivery.

Download Product Sheet (PDF)